Victoria Devore* In the midst of rising tuition rates and student debt, an unlikely individual is shedding light on an alternative method to become an attorney—one that seems to not require the woes or monetary sacrifices of law school. See, e.g., Jonathan Van Meter, The Awakening of Kim Kardashian West, Vogue (Apr. 10, 2019), https://www.vogue.com/article/kim-kardashian-west-cover-may-2019. Continue reading “Keeping up with the Kalifornia Bar”
Author Archives: University of Baltimore Law Review Staff
Who Decides What is Too Scandalous? The Supreme Court and Scandalous Trademarks.
Miranda Walker* I. Introduction June 24, 2019, would herald the end of Erik Brunetti’s (Brunetti) nearly thirty-years worth of fighting with the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to get his brand name trademarked. Samuel Hine, How O.G. Streetwear Brand FUCT Took a Free Speech Case All the Way to the Supreme Court, GQ (Jan. 30,Continue reading “Who Decides What is Too Scandalous? The Supreme Court and Scandalous Trademarks.”
From Platform to Publisher: The Call to Rein in the Political Influence of Big Tech
Kristin McManus* On July 25, 2019, presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard’s campaign (the Campaign) filed a complaint against Google, LLC alleging violations of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, Article I, § 2 of the California Constitution, the Lanham Act, and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. Complaint at 29, Tulsi Now,Continue reading “From Platform to Publisher: The Call to Rein in the Political Influence of Big Tech”
Monumental Changes: Bears Ears National Monument and Executive Authority Under the Antiquities Act of 1906
Jonathan Lucido* In a letter to then-Secretary of the Interior, Ryan Zinke (Secretary Zinke), the National Trust for Historic Preservation identified Bears Ears National Monument (BENM) as one of the most significant cultural landscapes in the United States. Letter from Stephanie K. Meeks, Chief Exec. Officer, Nat’l Tr. for Historic Pres., to Ryan Zinke, Sec’y,Continue reading “Monumental Changes: Bears Ears National Monument and Executive Authority Under the Antiquities Act of 1906”
Again, Can’t We All Just Have a Process that’s Due? The Implications of Due Process on Non-Citizens
Yemisi R. Giwa-Otusajo* I. Background The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States provides that no person shall “be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law[.]” U.S. Const. amend. V. The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution further provides that a criminal defendant must be afforded the right to aContinue reading “Again, Can’t We All Just Have a Process that’s Due? The Implications of Due Process on Non-Citizens”
University of Baltimore Law Review 